Wagner v. Charleston County Jail

Filing 920060728

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6252

THEODORE THOMAS WAGNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ANGIE SMITH; FNU LNU, Inmate, unknown at this time, Plaintiffs, versus CHARLESTON COUNTY JAIL; UNKNOWN OFFICERS, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 06-6354

THEODORE THOMAS WAGNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ANGIE SMITH; FNU LNU, Inmate, unknown at this time, Plaintiffs, versus

CHARLESTON COUNTY JAIL; UNKNOWN OFFICERS, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge; Joseph R. McCrorey, Magistrate Judge. (3:05-cv-01435-GRA)

Submitted:

July 19, 2006

Decided:

July 28, 2006

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Thomas Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Willcox Buyck, Darren K. Sanders, BUYCK LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina; Robert Gerald Chambers, Jr., TURNER & PADGETT, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM: Theodore Thomas Wagner appeals the magistrate judge's order denying his motion for an extension of time to serve process on unidentified Defendants and the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the magistrate judge and the district court. Wagner v. Charleston County Jail, No. 3:05-cv-01435-GRA (D.S.C. filed Jan. 9, 2006 & entered Jan. 10, 2006; filed Feb. 2, 2006 & entered Feb. 3, 2006). facts and legal before We dispense with oral argument because the are and adequately argument presented not in aid the the

contentions the court

materials

would

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -