US v. Hudgins
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ADRIAN MAURICE HUDGINS, a/k/a Dee, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:94-cr-00133-sgw)
Submitted: July 20, 2006
Decided: July 26, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adrian Maurice Hudgins, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge Mott, Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Adrian Maurice Hudgins appeals the district court's order denying his "motion to vacate and reimpose judgment," which the court construed as a motion to reopen the time for filing an appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hudgins, No. 7:94-cr-00133-sgw (W.D. Va. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
Jan. 19, 2006).
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?