Wagner v. Burtt

Filing 920060726

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6304 THEODORE THOMAS WAGNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STAN BURTT, Warden Leiber CI; MRS. L. CARYTON, Inmate Grievance LCI; MRS. WATFORD, Classification LCI all in their individual and official capacities; MR. CSEAR, Classification Sup LCI; JONATHAN E. OZMINT, Director SCDC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:05-cv-00372-GRA) Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 26, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Theodore Thomas Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. Nikole Deanna Haltiwanger, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Theodore Thomas Wagner, a South Carolina state prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint in which he claims that his constitutional rights were violated by exposure to second-hand, environmental tobacco smoke. We have reviewed the record and find that Wagner failed to establish that he was entitled to relief. Helling v. McKinney, 509 U.S. 25, 33-35 (1993) (providing standard). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 3:05-cv-00372-GRA (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2006). Wagner v. Burtt, No. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?