Grimes v. Red Onion State Prison
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
TIMOTHY GRIMES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RED ONION STATE PRISON; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; DANNY DAMRON; RONALD FOWLER; JAY MCCONNELL; ALAN MCCOWAN; JEFFREY PHILLIPS; ERIC SMITH; WILLIAM SYKES; DAVID TAYLOR; PAGE TRUE, Warden; WILLIAM WRIGHT; RANDY BOYD, Defendants - Appellees, and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:05-cv-00036-SGW-MFU)
October 18, 2006
November 15, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Grimes, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: Timothy Grimes appeals the district court's order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm Grimes v. Red Onion
for the reasons stated by the district court.
State Prison, No. 7:05-cv-00036-SGW-MFU (W.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?