US v. Irving
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PHILLIP AUBREY IRVING, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:04-cr-00078-jct)
September 29, 2006
December 20, 2006
Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Aubrey Irving, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Albert Lustig, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Phillip Aubrey Irving seeks to appeal the district
court's order denying his motion for specific performance in his criminal case. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the
notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of the order being appealed. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i). With or without a
motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v.
Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). The district court entered its order on December 16, 2005. The notice of appeal was filed on February 9, 2006. Because
Irving failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. moot Irving's motion to expedite this appeal. oral argument because the facts and legal We deny as
We dispense with contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?