In re: Dudley v.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
In Re: Brown,
SEAN LAMONT DUDLEY, a/k/a John D.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (5:99-cv-00152)
Submitted: August 24, 2006
Decided: August 30, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sean Lamont Dudley, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Sean Lamont Dudley petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court unduly delayed acting on his August 2004 motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing Our review of the district court's
the district court to act.
docket sheet reveals that the district court recently entered a final judgment on Dudley's motion for consideration. See Dudley v. United States, No. 5:99-cv-00152 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 2006).
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?