US v. Perez-Fulgencio
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CARLOS ALBERTO PEREZ-FULGENCIO, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:01-cr-30058-FFF; 7:05-cv-00235-sgw)
June 16, 2006
June 26, 2006
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carlos Alberto Perez-Fulgencio, Appellant Pro Se. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Ray B. ATTORNEY,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Carlos Alberto Perez-Fulgencio seeks to appeal the
district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The district court referred this case to a
magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000).
magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Perez-Fulgencio that the failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Fulgencio failed to object to Despite this warning, Perezthe magistrate judge's
recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins,
766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Perez-Fulgencio has waived appellate review by
failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?