Sullivan v. County of Spartanburg
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DAVID FARRELL SULLIVAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COUNTY OF SPARTANBURG; JAMES HARTMAN, County Administrator; JENNIFER WELLS, Assistant Solicitor; HAROLD W. GOWDY, III, Solicitor; SHERIFF, Spartanburg County; CLAY T. ALLEN, Public Defender; SERGEANT HOPKINS; UNKNOWN DEPUTY; LORETTA ROHER; SHANE DIEDMON; BILL BLANTON, Sheriff, Cherokee County; UNKNOWN DEPUTIES; LARRY POWERS, Administrator; UNKNOWN SERGEANT; UNKNOWN LIEUTENANT, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:05-cv-01282-HFF)
March 14, 2007
May 3, 2007
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Farrell Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: David Farrell Sullivan appeals the district court's
orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and denying reconsideration of that order. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, we affirm based upon the
district court's and magistrate judge's conclusions that Sullivan's claims are meritless. See Sullivan v. County of Spartanburg, No. We dispense with oral
6:05-cv-01282-HFF (D.S.C. Mar. 16, 2006).
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?