US v. Walden
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JEROME WALDEN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:95-cr-00063-JRS)
November 15, 2006
November 20, 2006
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome Walden, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, David John Novak, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Jerome Walden appeals the district court's orders denying his motions seeking a certificate of appealability and to hold his claims in abeyance. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Walden, No. 3:95-cr-00063-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2006; Mar. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?