US v. Walden

Filing 920061120

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6574

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JEROME WALDEN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:95-cr-00063-JRS)

Submitted:

November 15, 2006

Decided:

November 20, 2006

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Walden, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, David John Novak, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Jerome Walden appeals the district court's orders denying his motions seeking a certificate of appealability and to hold his claims in abeyance. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Walden, No. 3:95-cr-00063-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2006; Mar. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -