Holden v. Stansberry
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
RUDOLPH HOLDEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY; HARLEY LAPPIN; GUANJA, Regional Director; A. GONZALES, P.
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-hc-02004-FL)
Submitted: September 28, 2006
Decided: October 10, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rudolph Holden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Rudolph Holden, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the See Holden v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02004-FL We dispense with oral argument because
(E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2006).
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?