Duncan v. Solomon
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM DUNCAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus L. M. SOLOMON; J. N. VAUGHAN; WILLIAM CARROLL, JR.; W. C VINSON; B. COTTON; D. GLOVER, Lt.; D. FUTRELL, Lt.; REGINALD E. MIDGETTE, Rev.; LUCIEN CAPONE, III; JAMES C. JOHNSON; LUNSFORD LONG; MATTHEW ROUSE, JR.; N. M. JAMES; GEROTHA R. SPAIN; R. R. MEWBORN; BOYD BENNETT; CHARLES STEVENS, Manager; R. C. KING; C. EDWARDS; GWEN NORVILLE; JAMES BARBER; VICTORIA HUNT, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-ct-03001-H)
Submitted: September 28, 2006
Decided: October 10, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Duncan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: William Duncan appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm Duncan v. Solomon, We dispense with contentions are
for the reasons stated by the district court. No. 5:06-ct-03001-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2006). oral argument because the facts and legal
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?