US v. Harmon
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL TRACY HARMON, a/k/a Mike, a/k/a Mikey, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:99-cr-00023-RBS-13)
Submitted: July 25, 2006
Decided: August 3, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Tracy Harmon, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Michael Tracy Harmon appeals the district court's orders denying Harmon's motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), and Harmon's motions for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and affirm the denial of the underlying order for the reasons stated by the district court. In addition,
we find no abuse of the district court's discretion in denying the motions for reconsideration. 310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). court's orders. United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d Accordingly, we affirm the district
United States v. Harmon, No. 2:99-cr-00023-RBS-13 We dispense
(E.D. Va. Apr. 3, 2006; April 19, 2006; May 2, 2006).
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?