Walker v. Scott
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6966
HARRY WALKER, a/k/a Musa Aquil, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MORGAN E. SCOTT, JR.; BRETT BRAUMBAUGH, Postal Inspector; VIRGINIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, South Boston; MR. GRANT, New York District Attorney in charge of case 552-95; R. S. PULLIAM, Major; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:05-cv-00010-jct) Submitted: September 25, 2006 Decided: October 18, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harry Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Bugbee Winn, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia; Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY LAW FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Harry Walker appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Va. May 4, 2006). We dispense with Walker v. Scott, No. 7:05-cv-00010-jct (W.D.
Walker's motions for general relief are denied. oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?