In Re: Spotts v.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
KELVIN ANDRE SPOTTS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:06-cv-00109)
July 17, 2006
August 28, 2006
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelvin Andre Spotts, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Kelvin Andre Spotts filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging undue delay by the district court in directing a response from the United States to Spotts' 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The district court issued its final order in the case on May 24, 2006. Accordingly, the mandamus petition is now moot. Therefore,
although we grant the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion to expedite consideration of the
petition is denied as moot.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?