US v. Rudd
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PATRICK LEWIS a/k/a Louie, RUDD, a/k/a One-Eyed Louie, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (7:97-cr-00063-H-3)
Submitted: October 17, 2006
Decided: October 20, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Lewis Rudd, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Patrick Lewis Rudd appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reinstate the appeal period. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons United States v. Rudd, No. 7:97-cr-
stated by the district court.
00063-H-3 (E.D.N.C. filed May 13, 2006; entered May 19, 2006 & filed May 15, 2006; entered May 18, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?