Smith v. Ledford
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
HAROLD SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN D. LEDFORD, Sheriff; JAMES HARWOOD, Captain; DENNY GOFORTH, Chief Deputy; EDDIE RICE, Jail Administrator, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00152)
Submitted: October 17, 2006
Decided: October 24, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Harold Smith appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Ledford, No. 1:06-cv-00152
(W.D.N.C. May 22, 2006, June 19, 2006).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?