US v. Scott

Filing 920061003

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7197

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TRUMAN SCOTT, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:98-cr-00079-F-ALL)

Submitted: September 26, 2006

Decided: October 3, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Truman Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Truman Scott appeals the district court's order denying his "Demand for Production of Statements and Reports." reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have

Accordingly, we United

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

States v. Scott, No. 7:98-cr-00079-F-ALL (E.D.N.C. May 9, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -