McClinton v. Ewing
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CHARLIE EDWARD MCCLINTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHRIS HARRIS, of Probation, Pardon & Parole Services; MITCH TUCKER, of Probation, Pardon & Parole Services, Defendants - Appellees, and JOHN EWING, JR., of the Richland County Sheriff's Department; ELLIS PEARSON, of the Richland County Sheriff's Department; H. J. POOLES, of the Richland County Sheriff's Department; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ERIN GADDY; DANITA WALLACE; REGINALD I. LLOYD, Richland County Circuit Court Judge, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (6:05-cv-02999-PMD)
Submitted: November 15, 2006
November 22, 2006
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charlie Edward McClinton, Appellant Pro Se. Tommy Evans, Jr., SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: Charlie Edward McClinton appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have
Accordingly, we McClinton v. We dispense
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ewing, No. 6:05-cv-02999-PMD (D.S.C. June 12, 2006).
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?