Miller v. Pierce
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JAMES EDWARD MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MIKE PIERCE; DAVID PENDRY; BUTCH HOLLAND; TIM CHEEK; RONNIE PRICE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:99-cv-00050)
May 30, 2007
June 15, 2007
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Edward Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Mason Thomas, PATRICK, HARPER & DIXON, Hickory, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: James Edward Miller appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint upon remand from this court. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. June 28, 2006). Miller v. Pierce, No. 5:99-cv-00050 (W.D.N.C.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?