Odighizuwa v. Ray

Filing 920070222

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7331

PETER O. ODIGHIZUWA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TRACEY S. RAY, Warden; LIEUTENANT MULLINS, in his official and individual capacity; LIEUTENANT YOUNEE, in his official and individual capacity; LIEUTENANT ROSE, in his official and individual capacity; SERGEANT DAY, in his official and individual capacity; CAPTAIN TAYLOR, in his official and individual capacity; DOCTOR WILLIAMS, in his individual capacity and official capacity; LIEUTENANT YOUNCE, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 06-7850

PETER O. ODIGHIZUWA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TRACEY S. RAY, Warden; LIEUTENANT MULLINS, in his official and individual capacity; LIEUTENANT YOUNEE, in his official and individual capacity; LIEUTENANT ROSE, in his official and individual capacity; SERGEANT DAY, in his official and individual capacity;

CAPTAIN TAYLOR, in his official and individual capacity; LIEUTENANT YOUNCE, Defendants - Appellees, and DOCTOR WILLIAMS, in his individual capacity and official capacity, Defendant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00185-gec)

Submitted: February 15, 2007

Decided:

February 22, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter O. Odighizuwa, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM: In appeals the these consolidated court's appeals, orders Peter O. a Odighizuwa preliminary

district

denying

injunction and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Odighizuwa v. Ray, No. 7:06-cv-00185-gec (W.D. Va. July 13, 2006; Oct. 24, 2006). We deny Odighizuwa's motions for We dispense with contentions are

appointment of counsel and for an injunction. oral argument because the facts and legal

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -