Odighizuwa v. Ray

Filing 920070222

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7331 PETER O. ODIGHIZUWA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TRACEY S. RAY, Warden; LIEUTENANT MULLINS, in his official and individual capacity; LIEUTENANT YOUNEE, in his official and individual capacity; LIEUTENANT ROSE, in his official and individual capacity; SERGEANT DAY, in his official and individual capacity; CAPTAIN TAYLOR, in his official and individual capacity; DOCTOR WILLIAMS, in his individual capacity and official capacity; LIEUTENANT YOUNCE, Defendants - Appellees. No. 06-7850 PETER O. ODIGHIZUWA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus TRACEY S. RAY, Warden; LIEUTENANT MULLINS, in his official and individual capacity; LIEUTENANT YOUNEE, in his official and individual capacity; LIEUTENANT ROSE, in his official and individual capacity; SERGEANT DAY, in his official and individual capacity; CAPTAIN TAYLOR, in his official and individual capacity; LIEUTENANT YOUNCE, Defendants - Appellees, and DOCTOR WILLIAMS, in his individual capacity and official capacity, Defendant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00185-gec) Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 22, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Peter O. Odighizuwa, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: In appeals the these consolidated court's appeals, orders Peter O. a Odighizuwa preliminary district denying injunction and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odighizuwa v. Ray, No. 7:06-cv-00185-gec (W.D. Va. July 13, 2006; Oct. 24, 2006). We deny Odighizuwa's motions for We dispense with contentions are appointment of counsel and for an injunction. oral argument because the facts and legal adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?