Randolph v. Felts

Filing 920061024

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7466

JACK DEWHAN RANDOLPH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHARLES T. FELTS, Warden, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston, District Judge. (5:05-cv-00805)

Submitted: October 17, 2006

Decided: October 24, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jack Dewhan Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Jack Dewhan Randolph appeals the district court's

judgment order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm See Randolph v. We dispense

for the reasons stated by the district court.

Felts, No. 5:05-cv-00805 (S.D.W. Va. July 21, 2006).

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

To the extent Randolph may be seeking authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, we deny authorization. - 2 -

*