Graham v. District Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
PAUL GRAHAM, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DISTRICT COURT, for Baltimore County, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cv-02038-CCB)
January 18, 2007
Decided: January 23, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Graham, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Paul Graham appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint. The district court stated that the
document was a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) complaint, but because Graham is not challenging a conviction or sentence, the claim is more properly construed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000).
Nonetheless, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Graham v. District Court, No. 1:06-cv-02038-CCB We deny Graham's motions for appointment We dispense with oral argument
(D. Md. Aug. 22, 2006).
of counsel and oral argument.
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?