Palacio v. Stansberry
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JORGE PALACIO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-hc-02132-FL)
March 29, 2007
April 3, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jorge Palacio, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Jorge Palacio, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), challenging his sentence in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and asserting that the imposition of a term of supervised release violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and conclude that Palacio cannot proceed under § 2241 because he does not meet the standard set forth in In re Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir. 2000). affirm the denial of relief. Accordingly, we
Palacio's motion to proceed in forma We dispense with oral argument
pauperis on appeal is granted.
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?