US v. Davis
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANGELO DEMOND DAVIS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00030; 3:06-cv-00022-V-1)
February 22, 2007
March 1, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angelo Demond Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina; Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Angelo Demond Davis appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his motions for reconsideration filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Our review of the record Davis's motions for
discloses that this appeal is without merit.
reconsideration do not demonstrate that his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) was improperly dismissed. find that the district court's denial of his We therefore motions for
reconsideration was not an abuse of discretion.
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and affirm the district court's order on the reasoning of the district court. See United
States v. Davis, Nos. 3:04-cr-00030, 3:06-cv-00022-V-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?