US v. London
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KITANTE LONDON, a/k/a Keith, a/k/a Bone, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:03-cr-000645)
Submitted: November 15, 2006
Decided: November 27, 2006
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kitante London, Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Kitante London appeals a district court order denying his motion to reopen sentencing. We have reviewed the district court's order and the record and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. London, No. 3:03-cr-000645 We grant We
(D.S.C. filed Aug. 29, 2006; entered Aug. 30, 2006).
London's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?