Joe v. Funderburk

Filing 920070131

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7704 RODERICK JOE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM B. FUNDERBURK, Clerk of Court for Marlboro County; ROBERT E. WARD, Deputy Director; DIVISION OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES; ROBERT E. PETERSON, Deputy General Counsel; JOHN DAVIS; BARNEY LOYD, Associate Warden; WHITNEY SMITH, Captain; LIEUTENANT COIDEN; SERGEANT LUX; SERGEANT ARFLIN; OFFICER GLENN; J. C. COUNTS, Associate Warden; RICHARD C. BEARDEN, MD; SCDC ADA COORDINATOR; COUNSELOR FOX, Mental Health Counselor at Evans Correctional Institution; COUNSELOR MOSES, Mental Health Counselor at Evans Correctional Institution; DIVISION OF INVESTIGATIONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:06-cv-00119-GRA) Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: January 31, 2007 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roderick Joe, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Roderick Joe appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Joe v. Funderburk, No. 8:06-cv-00119-GRA (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?