Dye v. Batten

Filing 920061222

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7735 QUINTIS DYE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CHRIS BATTEN, Sheriff; ALEXANDER SINGLETARY, Deputy Sheriff; GREGG COLE; CLEMINTINE THOMPSON; RONALD HEWETT, Sheriff; JANE EVANS, Deputy Sheriff; KEVIN HOLDEN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-03034-H) Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 22, 2006 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Quintis Dye, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Quintis Dye appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Oct. 4, 2006). Dye v. Batten, No. 5:06-cv-03034-H (E.D.N.C. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?