Tinsley v. Harris
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JAMES HENRY TINSLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR HARRIS, Attending Physician, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:05-cv-00730-JBF)
May 16, 2007
June 4, 2007
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Henry Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa Ehrich, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: James Henry Tinsley appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. affirm for the reasons stated by the We have
Accordingly, we court. See
Tinsley v. Harris, No. 2:05-cv-00730-JBF (E.D. Va. Oct. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?