Webb v. Pearson
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL A. WEBB, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EDDIE PEARSON, Warden; MR. POLITE, Correction Officer; HAMLLET, Lieutenant; MR. NICKELS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:04-cv-00815-LMB)
March 19, 2007
April 13, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael A. Webb, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael A. Webb appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as to defendants Pearson, Hamllet, and Nickels; awarding default judgment and $5000 damages We against have defendant reviewed the Polite; record and and denying find no
reconsideration. reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm all orders for the Webb v. Pearson, No. 1:04-
reasons stated by the district court.
cv-00815-LMB (E.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2004; Aug. 23, 2006; and Oct. 17, 2006). We also deny Webb's motion for summary judgment filed in We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?