Newman v. Johnson

Filing 920070518

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7977 HERMAN CEFUS NEWMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director; FRED SCHILLING, Medical Director; EDDIE PEARSON, Warden; HUNTER JOHNSON, Major; MS. MASSENGBURG, Grievance Coordinator, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:05-cv-00566-JBF) Submitted: May 4, 2007 Decided: May 18, 2007 Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herman Cefus Newman, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Herman Cefus Newman appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we Newman v. 2006). We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson, No. 2:05-cv-00566-JBF (E.D. Va. Nov. 6, dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?