Steeves v. US
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT F. STEEVES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ANDREW C. VON ESCHENBACH, Acting Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Defendants - Appellees. and LESTER M. CRAWFORD, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Food and Drug Administration; LESTER M. CRAWFORD, individually and personally; NORRIS ALDERSON; MARLENE HAFFNER; MURRAY LUMPKIN, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:05-cv-00043-NKM)
June 22, 2007
July 12, 2007
Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert F. Steeves, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Bugbee Winn, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: Robert F. Steeves appeals the district court's order granting the Appellees' motion to dismiss his civil complaint in which he alleged numerous workplace violations by current and former employees of the Food and Drug Administration. The district court found it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Steeves's claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Steeves v. United States, No. 3:05-cv-00043 (W.D. Va., We deny Steeves's motion to strike the Appellees' We dispense with oral argument because the facts
Dec. 6, 2006). informal brief.
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?