Kent v. Maryland Transp Authority

Filing 920070709

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1043 DIANE M. KENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; LIEUTENANT DANA WHITT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:06-cv-02351-CCB) Submitted: May 30, 2007 Decided: July 9, 2007 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Diane M. Kent, Appellant Pro Se. Gisele Marie Mathews, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Diane M. Kent appeals from the district court's order dismissing her complaint against her former employer and supervisor under the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. 2601-2654 (2000) ("FMLA"). 12(b)(6) should A motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. be granted only if, after accepting all well-pleaded allegations in the complaint as true, it appears certain that the plaintiff cannot prove any set of facts in support of her claim entitling her to relief. Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 244 (4th Cir. 1999). We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kent v. Maryland We Transp. Auth., No. 1:06-cv-02351-CCB (D. Md. Dec. 21, 2006). dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decision making process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?