Kent v. Maryland Transp Authority

Filing 920070709

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1043

DIANE M. KENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARYLAND TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; LIEUTENANT DANA WHITT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:06-cv-02351-CCB)

Submitted:

May 30, 2007

Decided:

July 9, 2007

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Diane M. Kent, Appellant Pro Se. Gisele Marie Mathews, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Diane M. Kent appeals from the district court's order dismissing her complaint against her former employer and supervisor under the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654 (2000) ("FMLA"). 12(b)(6) should A motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. be granted only if, after accepting all

well-pleaded allegations in the complaint as true, it appears certain that the plaintiff cannot prove any set of facts in support of her claim entitling her to relief. Edwards v. City of

Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 244 (4th Cir. 1999).

We have thoroughly

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kent v. Maryland We

Transp. Auth., No. 1:06-cv-02351-CCB (D. Md. Dec. 21, 2006).

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decision making process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -