Fiorani v. Lowry
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ROSARIO A. FIORANI, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALBERT J. LOWRY, personally and as agent for; IMPERIAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, formerly known as ES, Limited Liability Company; BRADLEY LOUIS BOOKE, Esquire; S. DAVID B'SEDEK; SINA THOMPSON; SARA KLEINMAN; GARRETT BALL; YAHOO! INCORPORATED, Legal Department, Customer Service, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:06-cv-01271-GBL)
July 9, 2007
July 24, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint.* reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have
court properly concluded that Fiorani failed to allege federal question jurisdiction. See Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973). Even if the district court erred with respect to its
conclusion that it lacked diversity jurisdiction, dismissal was appropriate given that venue in the Eastern District of Virginia was improper. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's
dismissal of the complaint.
We grant Fiorani's motion to proceed
on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
We have jurisdiction to consider this appeal because the order of dismissal suggests that no amendment to the complaint could cure the defects in Fiorani's case. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). - 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?