Edmond v. Nigh
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JOHN EDMOND; PAMELA LYLES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus JUDY NIGH; SNOWDEN CHASE MAHER; PRINCE GEORGE'S PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY UNIDENTIFIED OFFICERS 1 MARYLAND, REALTY; EDWARD J. COUNTY, MARYLAND; SHERIFF'S OFFICE; and 2; STATE OF Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:05-cv-02750-DKC)
Submitted: July 24, 2007
July 26, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Edmond, Pamela Lyles, Appellants Pro Se. Juliane Corroon Miller, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia; William Leonard Mitchell, II, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Washington, D.C.; Rajeshanand Kumar, PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Upper Marlboro, Maryland; Cynthia G. Peltzman, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: John Edmond and Pamela Lyles appeal the district court's order dismissing their civil action arising out of their eviction from an apartment in Laurel, Maryland. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Edmond v. Nigh, No. 8:05-cv02750-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 8, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?