Edmond v. Nigh

Filing 920070726

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1151

JOHN EDMOND; PAMELA LYLES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus JUDY NIGH; SNOWDEN CHASE MAHER; PRINCE GEORGE'S PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY UNIDENTIFIED OFFICERS 1 MARYLAND, REALTY; EDWARD J. COUNTY, MARYLAND; SHERIFF'S OFFICE; and 2; STATE OF Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:05-cv-02750-DKC)

Submitted: July 24, 2007

Decided:

July 26, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Edmond, Pamela Lyles, Appellants Pro Se. Juliane Corroon Miller, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia; William Leonard Mitchell, II, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Washington, D.C.; Rajeshanand Kumar, PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Upper Marlboro, Maryland; Cynthia G. Peltzman, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: John Edmond and Pamela Lyles appeal the district court's order dismissing their civil action arising out of their eviction from an apartment in Laurel, Maryland. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Edmond v. Nigh, No. 8:05-cv02750-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 8, 2007). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -