Inman v. Astrue
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DENISE M. INMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Dennis L. Howell, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00021)
March 19, 2008
March 28, 2008
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
V. Lamar Gudger, III, GUDGER & GUDGER, P.A., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Robert J. Triba, Chief Regional Counsel, Jason W. Valencia, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Denise M. Inman appeals the magistrate judge's order* denying Inman's motion for summary judgment, granting the
Commissioner's motion for summary judgment, and affirming the Commissioner's benefits. error. decision denying Inman disability insurance
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
magistrate judge. See Inman v. Astrue, No. 1:06-cv-00021 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The parties consented to have the case magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?