Peamon v. A and R Development
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
RICHARD PEAMON, Plaintiff - Appellant, and BILL NORRIS; MICHAEL RICH, Plaintiffs, versus A AND R DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-02974-WMN)
Submitted: June 15, 2007
June 20, 2007
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Peamon, Appellant Pro Se. Paul D. Shelton, MCKENNON, SHELTON & HENN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Paula Jeanette McGill, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Richard Peamon seeks to appeal the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion to set aside a default judgment and quashing service of process. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). order nor The order Peamon seeks to appeal is neither a final an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?