Hicks v. Wilshire Credit Corp
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
GARY D. HICKS; CLYDE CASEY; JEAN CASEY, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus WILSHIRE CREDIT CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:06-cv02195-RWT)
November 30, 2007
January 7, 2008
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
M. Albert Figinski, John A. Pica, Jr., Michael W. Reed, Thomas P. Kelly, LAW OFFICES OF PETER G. ANGELOS, PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Brian L. Moffet, GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER & HOLLANDER, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Gary Hicks, Clyde Casey, and Jean Casey appeal the district court's order denying their motion to remand and granting Wilshire Credit Corporation's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on Accordingly, we affirm for
appeal and find no reversible error.
the reasons stated by the district court at the hearing held on February 26, 2007. Hicks v. Wilshire Credit Corp., No. 8:06-cvWe dispense with oral argument
02195-RWT) (D. Md. Feb. 26, 2007).
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?