Cunningham v. Lemmon

Filing 920071023

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1292

WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID LEMMON, Colonel, Defendant - Appellee, and STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (6:06-cv-00169)

Submitted:

October 15, 2007

Decided:

October 23, 2007

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Lanham, John A. Hoyer, STATE POLICE Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Virginia Grottendieck LEGAL COUNSEL, South

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM: William Cunningham appeals a district court order and judgment order adopting the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation, granting the Defendants' motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil rights complaint challenging provisions of the West Virginia Sex Offender Registration Act ("Act"), West Va. Code Ann. §§ 15-12-1 - 15-12-10 (LexisNexis 2004 & Supp. 2007). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Cunningham v. Lemmon, No. 6:06-cv-00169 (S.D. W. Va. Mar. 22, 2007). Cunningham has

filed motions to certify questions to the United States Supreme Court and to file a supplemental informal brief. We deny the

motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -