Cunningham v. Lemmon
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID LEMMON, Colonel, Defendant - Appellee, and STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (6:06-cv-00169)
October 15, 2007
October 23, 2007
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Lanham, John A. Hoyer, STATE POLICE Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Virginia Grottendieck LEGAL COUNSEL, South
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: William Cunningham appeals a district court order and judgment order adopting the magistrate judge's report and
recommendation, granting the Defendants' motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil rights complaint challenging provisions of the West Virginia Sex Offender Registration Act ("Act"), West Va. Code Ann. §§ 15-12-1 - 15-12-10 (LexisNexis 2004 & Supp. 2007). We have
reviewed the record and the district court's order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Cunningham v. Lemmon, No. 6:06-cv-00169 (S.D. W. Va. Mar. 22, 2007). Cunningham has
filed motions to certify questions to the United States Supreme Court and to file a supplemental informal brief. We deny the
motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?