Abdu v. Mukasey
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MONA MOHAMMED ABDU, Petitioner, versus MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A95-899-263)
December 10, 2007
December 27, 2007
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Israel W. Gobena, GOBENA & DE WALT, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Shelley R. Goad, Senior Litigation Counsel, Dalin R. Holyoak, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Mona Mohammed Abdu, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely and numerically barred her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the
record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 744 (4th Cir. 2006). See Barry v.
Further, we lack
jurisdiction to review the Board's refusal to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings. 492 F.3d 153, 155 (2d Cir. 2007). See Zhao Quon Chen v. Gonzales, Accordingly, we deny in part and We dispense with oral
dismiss in part the petition for review.
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?