Sadio Diallo v. Michael Mukasey
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
SADIO DIALLO, Petitioner, versus MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-622-486)
December 17, 2007
April 28, 2008
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter Nyoh, LAW OFFICES OF ENOW & PATCHA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Jason Xavier Hamilton, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Sadio Diallo, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
("Board") denying her motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Diallo's motion to reopen as untimely. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i) (West 2005 Accordingly, we deny See
& Supp. 2007); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2007).
the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
In re: Diallo, No. A97-622-486 (B.I.A. Mar. 22, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?