Smith v. Houchens Industries
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
PAUL VERNON SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HOUCHENS INDUSTRIES, d/b/a Save-A-Lot, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (6:06-cv-03405-HFF)
July 27, 2007
August 15, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Vernon Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Wade Edward Ballard, FORD & HARRISON, LLP, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Paul Vernon Smith seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The magistrate judge's report and recommendation Smith seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Accordingly, we dismiss the
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?