Moore v. Leavitt

Filing 920071217

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1372 NANCY F. MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL LEAVITT, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:04-cv-02819-WDQ) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 17, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norton C. Joerg, Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Jason D. Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nancy F. Moore appeals the district court's orders denying her motion to amend her complaint and granting Defendant summary judgment on her employment discrimination and retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). and find no reversible error.* We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we affirm See substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Thompson, No. 1:04-cv-02819-WDQ (D. Md. Feb. 9, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED We have assumed for purposes of this appeal that the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White, 126 S. Ct. 2405 (2006) "adverse employment action" standard applies to retaliation claims brought by federal employees. - 2 - *

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?