Malhotra v. Watergate at Landmark
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
SANJEEV MALHOTRA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WATERGATE AT LANDMARK (WAL) CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, WAL Board of Directors and/or its assignees, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:05-cv-00076-LMB)
October 12, 2007
October 23, 2007
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sanjeev Malhotra, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Curtis Gartner, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Sanjeev Malhotra appeals the district court's orders denying his motions to reopen and for sanctions. the record and find no reversible error. for the reasons stated by the district We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm court. Malhotra v.
Watergate at Landmark Condo. Assoc., No. 1:05-cv-00076-LMB (E.D. Va. Apr. 4 & 6, 2007). We dispense with oral We deny Appellee's motion for sanctions. argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?