Cornelius v. Howell

Filing 920071022

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1514

NADINE CORNELIUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SAMUEL HOWELL; THE CITY OF COLUMBIA; COUNTY OF RICHLAND; NICOLE ANDERSON; EDWARD ANDERSON; CAMILLE ANDERSON; JOSHUA ANDERSON; FNU LNU; CLEOPHUR MORRIS, Mr. and Mrs. and Daughter; KENNETH LNU; MRS. BARBARA CORNELIUS HICKS; MS. MELVIN CORNELIUS; FNU LNU; CAROLYN HILL, and light skinned boyfriend; CHARLES GEIGER; MRS. SUSAN GEIGER; TYRONE GEIGER; CRICKET GEIGER, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:06-cv-03387-MBS)

Submitted:

October 18, 2007

Decided:

October 22, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nadine Cornelius, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Nadine dismissing her Cornelius civil appeals for the district of court's order matter

action

lack

subject

jurisdiction. error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Cornelius v. Howell, No. 3:06-cv-03387-MBS (D.S.C. Jan. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -