Cornelius v. Howell
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
NADINE CORNELIUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SAMUEL HOWELL; THE CITY OF COLUMBIA; COUNTY OF RICHLAND; NICOLE ANDERSON; EDWARD ANDERSON; CAMILLE ANDERSON; JOSHUA ANDERSON; FNU LNU; CLEOPHUR MORRIS, Mr. and Mrs. and Daughter; KENNETH LNU; MRS. BARBARA CORNELIUS HICKS; MS. MELVIN CORNELIUS; FNU LNU; CAROLYN HILL, and light skinned boyfriend; CHARLES GEIGER; MRS. SUSAN GEIGER; TYRONE GEIGER; CRICKET GEIGER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (3:06-cv-03387-MBS)
October 18, 2007
October 22, 2007
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nadine Cornelius, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Nadine dismissing her Cornelius civil appeals for the district of court's order matter
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Cornelius v. Howell, No. 3:06-cv-03387-MBS (D.S.C. Jan. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?