Kendall v. Gupta

Filing 920080813

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1563 In Re: STEVEN NEIL KENDALL, Debtor. -------------------------------APARNA GUPTA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STEVEN NEIL KENDALL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00122-LMB; BK-05-14772; 06-01019-SSM) Submitted: July 1, 2008 Decided: August 13, 2008 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. A. Hugo Blankingship, III, BLANKINGSHIP & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Richard G. Hall, Annandale, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Steven Kendall appeals from the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order entering judgment in favor of Aparna Gupta on her action challenging the dischargeability, under 11 U.S.C. 523(a)(2)(A) (2000), of a $65,000 loan made by Gupta to Kendall. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the parties' briefs and conclude that the bankruptcy court did not clearly err in finding that the debt at issue constituted an "extension, renewal, or refinancing of credit," and that it was procured through fraud, within the meaning of 523(a)(2). re Biondo, 180 F.3d 126, 130 (4th Cir. 1999). See In Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?