Jia Wang v. Michael Mukasey
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JIA QING WANG, Petitioner, versus MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A77-977-545)
January 31, 2008
February 22, 2008
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Brown, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Barry J. Pettinato, Assistant Director, Carmel A. Morgan, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Jia Qing Wang, a native and citizen of the People's Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board") denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings based upon changed circumstances. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board's order and conclude the Board did not abuse its discretion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2007); INS v.
Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992); Nibagwire v. Gonzales, 450 F.3d 153, 156 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition Wang v. Mukasey,
for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
No. A77-977-545 (B.I.A. June 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?