Lee v. Clark
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
REGINALD LEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KEVIN CLARK; JOHN DOE, JR.; RICHARD ROE, Officer, in their individual and official capacities; BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT; THEO FLEET, Officer, Defendants - Appellees, and MARTIN O'MALLEY; DOUGLAS L. PATTERSON; BALTIMORE CITY COUNCIL; CITY OF BALTIMORE; SHEILA DIXON, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:05-cv-00897-WDQ)
February 21, 2008
February 25, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Stakem Hornig, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Patrick Donald Sheridan, William Rowe Phelan, Jr., BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM: Reginald Lee appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm See Lee v. Clark, We dispense with contentions are
for the reasons stated by the district court. No. 1:05-cv-00897-WDQ (D. Md. June 26, 2007). oral argument because the facts and legal
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?