Foster v. Renfro Corporation

Filing 920080428


Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1772 ESTHER FOSTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RENFRO CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. No. 08-1193 ESTHER FOSTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RENFRO CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge; Bruce H. Hendricks, Magistrate Judge. (7:07-cv-00124-HFF) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Esther Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Cara Yates Crotty, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. - 2 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Esther Foster appeals the district court's denial of her motions to remand and to appoint counsel and the court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Foster v. Renfro Corp., No. 7:07-cv-00124-HFF We deny Foster's motion to district court. (D.S.C. May 2, 2007; Jan. 29, 2008). appoint counsel and deny as moot Renfro Corporation's motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?