Koikoi Guilavogui v. Michael Mukasey

Filing 920080721

Opinion

Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1802 KOIKOI GUILAVOGUI, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: June 2, 2008 Decided: July 21, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher N. Lasch, Michael J. Wishnie, JEROME N. FRANK LEGAL SERVICES ORGANIZATION, New Haven, Connecticut, for Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Rebecca Hoffberg, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Koikoi Guilavogui, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board's order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See Barry v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 744 (4th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 1147 (2007). Further, we lack jurisdiction to review the Board's refusal to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings. Quon Chen v. Gonzales, 492 F.3d 153, 155 (2d See Zhao 2007). Cir. Accordingly, we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. and We deny Guilavogui's motion to hold this case in abeyance with oral argument because the facts and legal dispense contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART - 2 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?