Jean Djindjeu Nkwendja v. Michael Mukasey
Filing
920080715
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1862
JEAN COLBERT DJINDJEU NKWENDJA, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted:
June 20, 2008
Decided:
July 15, 2008
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter Nyoh, PETER NYOH AND ASSOCIATES, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Mark C. Walters, Assistant Director, W. Manning Evans, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Jean Colbert Djindjeu Nkwendja, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions Appeals for review of an order opinion of the Board of
Immigration
affirming
without
the
Immigration
Judge's denial of his applications for relief from removal. Nkwendja first challenges the determination that he
failed to establish eligibility for asylum.
To obtain reversal of
a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien "must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution." INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have
reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Nkwendja fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Nkwendja cannot meet the more stringent
standard for withholding of removal.
Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198,
205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?